About Me
Research Interests
Machine Learning, Natural Language Processing, Data Visualization and Analytics, Big Data.
Publications
2022
William Van Woensel; Samina Abidi; Karthik Tennankore; George Worthen; Syed Sibte Raza Abidi
Clinical Guidelines as Executable and Interactive Workflows with FHIR-Compliant Health Data Input using GLEAN Proceedings Article
In: 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 2022): Demo Track, June 14-17, Halifax, 2022, Springer, 2022.
BibTeX | Tags: Clinical Decision Support Systems, Clinical guidelines, Notation3, Semantic Web reasoning, Task Network Models
@inproceedings{glean-demo,
title = {Clinical Guidelines as Executable and Interactive Workflows with FHIR-Compliant Health Data Input using GLEAN},
author = {William Van Woensel and Samina Abidi and Karthik Tennankore and George Worthen and Syed Sibte Raza Abidi},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-06-17},
urldate = {2022-06-17},
booktitle = {20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 2022): Demo Track, June 14-17, Halifax, 2022},
publisher = {Springer},
keywords = {Clinical Decision Support Systems, Clinical guidelines, Notation3, Semantic Web reasoning, Task Network Models},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inproceedings}
}
William Van Woensel; Samina Abidi; Karthik Tennankore; George Worthen; Syed Sibte Raza Abidi
Explainable Decision Support using Task Network Models in Notation3: Computerizing Lipid Management Clinical Guidelines as Interactive Task Networks Proceedings Article
In: 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 2022), June 14-17, 2022, Halifax, Springer, 2022.
BibTeX | Tags: Clinical Decision Support Systems, Clinical guidelines, Notation3, Semantic Web reasoning, Task Network Models
@inproceedings{glean_2022,
title = {Explainable Decision Support using Task Network Models in Notation3: Computerizing Lipid Management Clinical Guidelines as Interactive Task Networks},
author = {William Van Woensel and Samina Abidi and Karthik Tennankore and George Worthen and Syed Sibte Raza Abidi},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-06-17},
urldate = {2022-06-17},
booktitle = {20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 2022), June 14-17, 2022, Halifax},
publisher = {Springer},
keywords = {Clinical Decision Support Systems, Clinical guidelines, Notation3, Semantic Web reasoning, Task Network Models},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inproceedings}
}
2021
William Van Woensel; Syed Sibte Raza Abidi; Samina Raza Abidi
In: Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol. 118, pp. 102127, 2021, ISSN: 0933-3657.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Clinical guidelines, Comorbidity, Decision Support Systems
@article{VANWOENSEL2021102127,
title = {Decision support for comorbid conditions via execution-time integration of clinical guidelines using transaction-based semantics and temporal planning},
author = {William Van Woensel and Syed Sibte Raza Abidi and Samina Raza Abidi},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0933365721001202},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102127},
issn = {0933-3657},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-08-01},
journal = {Artificial Intelligence in Medicine},
volume = {118},
pages = {102127},
abstract = {In case of comorbidity, i.e., multiple medical conditions, Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) should issue recommendations based on all relevant disease-related Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG). However, treatments from multiple comorbid CPG often interact adversely (e.g., drug-drug interactions) or introduce operational inefficiencies (e.g., redundant scans). A common solution is the a-priori integration of computerized CPG, which involves integration decisions such as discarding, replacing or delaying clinical tasks (e.g., treatments) to avoid adverse interactions or inefficiencies. We argue this insufficiently deals with execution-time events: as the patient's health profile evolves, acute conditions occur, and real-time delays take place, new CPG integration decisions will often be needed, and prior ones may need to be reverted or undone. Any realistic CPG integration effort needs to further consider temporal aspects of clinical tasks—these are not only restricted by temporal constraints from CPGs (e.g., sequential relations, task durations) but also by CPG integration efforts (e.g., avoid treatment overlap). This poses a complex execution-time challenge and makes it difficult to determine an up-to-date, optimal comorbid care plan. We present a solution for dynamic integration of CPG in response to evolving health profiles and execution-time events. CPG integration policies are formulated by clinical experts for coping with comorbidity at execution-time, with clearly defined integration semantics that build on Description and Transaction Logics. A dynamic planning approach reconciles temporal constraints of CPG tasks at execution-time based on their importance, and continuously updates an optimal task schedule.},
keywords = {Clinical guidelines, Comorbidity, Decision Support Systems},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
In case of comorbidity, i.e., multiple medical conditions, Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) should issue recommendations based on all relevant disease-related Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG). However, treatments from multiple comorbid CPG often interact adversely (e.g., drug-drug interactions) or introduce operational inefficiencies (e.g., redundant scans). A common solution is the a-priori integration of computerized CPG, which involves integration decisions such as discarding, replacing or delaying clinical tasks (e.g., treatments) to avoid adverse interactions or inefficiencies. We argue this insufficiently deals with execution-time events: as the patient's health profile evolves, acute conditions occur, and real-time delays take place, new CPG integration decisions will often be needed, and prior ones may need to be reverted or undone. Any realistic CPG integration effort needs to further consider temporal aspects of clinical tasks—these are not only restricted by temporal constraints from CPGs (e.g., sequential relations, task durations) but also by CPG integration efforts (e.g., avoid treatment overlap). This poses a complex execution-time challenge and makes it difficult to determine an up-to-date, optimal comorbid care plan. We present a solution for dynamic integration of CPG in response to evolving health profiles and execution-time events. CPG integration policies are formulated by clinical experts for coping with comorbidity at execution-time, with clearly defined integration semantics that build on Description and Transaction Logics. A dynamic planning approach reconciles temporal constraints of CPG tasks at execution-time based on their importance, and continuously updates an optimal task schedule.